![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't know." According to my understanding, in a bench trial, the judge determines the facts. How does a judge determine that one party doesn't know a certain thing unless that party so testifies? It would certainly be my position that my adversary knows a certain thing FROM ME (because it is true and I told it to him) but chooses to ignore that knowledge. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|